EAP Tax Strategy

We plot tax-to-GDP ratios across EAP over the past two decades and check whether the WB's recommendations track the realised revenue path at country and instrument level.

Headline: Tax/GDP has been broadly flat across EAP since 2010 despite sustained advisory engagement. Some Prior Actions are misaligned with realised tax revenue at country level. The flatness is hard to explain by the quantity of advice — it points to factors beyond instrument design.

Tax revenue has been broadly flat

Tax-to-GDP ratios across EAP, 2004 onwards
Tax revenue (% of GDP) by country, 2004 onwards. Pacific economies sit at 20–25%, Southeast Asia at 12–17%, Indonesia at 10–11% for two decades, Myanmar at 6% and falling.

Composition has barely moved

Tax composition by country, 2004–2020s
Tax composition (% of GDP) by country, 2004–2020s.
Composition change between early and late window
Composition change between early and late window. Most countries cluster on the 45-degree line — composition is stable.

Alignment with the recommendations

Each DPF prior action with a clear revenue-raising or revenue-cutting direction is plotted against the realised total tax/GDP move in the 3-year post-mean minus 3-year pre-mean window. Each square = one prior action; the inner glyph (+ raise, cut) shows the recommended direction; the colour shows whether realised revenue moved in that direction.

Alignment of DPF tax recommendations with realised tax/GDP
Alignment of DPF tax recommendations with realised tax/GDP, by country and year, FY2013–FY2022. Indonesia is the most striking case: six revenue-raising prior actions across FY2016–FY2020, all six in misaligned cells.

Findings

Source files

All figures
19 PNG files
Trend, composition, alignment heatmaps + presentation variants.
Code
9 R scripts
Includes the alignment-revisit pipeline with audited direction-sign overrides.

Next: Section 3 — Inequality →