We collect and categorize all 105 DPO/PFR tax-policy recommendations issued by the World Bank in East Asia and the Pacific between FY2015 and FY2025. We classify them by tax instrument, country, source (DPO vs PFR/PER), and direction, then look for patterns.
Composition of the portfolio
How EAP compares with other WB regions
EAP sits in the middle of the six WB regions on tax DPF prior actions. Whatever explains the flatness of EAP tax/GDP since 2010, it is unlikely to be the quantity of WB tax advisory engagement.
Current engagement, FY2025
Findings
- WB tax advise was active across EAP, with 10 countries receiving DPF advice and 17 receiving PFR/PER advice.
- Advice has focused on consumption and corporate taxes, with less attention to direct personal taxation.
- Significant variation in the number of recommendations across countries; some receive many, others none despite similar tax patterns.
- We don't seem to take a regional view on issues; country advice prevails.
Reflection: To what extent do recommendations reflect WB advice capacity, country comfort and political economy, compared to the structural conditions and tax needs of EAP economies?